Skip to main content

Concept of Crime and Law and Emergence of Criminal Law

I Crime and Law 



Crime and Law are two very common yet too technical terms. Both exist in the society simultaneously but exist in contradiction to one another and lose their meaning in absence of other.

Before heading forward into details and technicalities, let's first start with the definitions of the two:

1. Crime: The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines crime as' an illegal act for which someone can be punished by the government especially: a gross violation of law' 

According to Blackstone Crime is," “an act committed or omitted in violation of public law forbidding or commanding it"

According to Stephen Crime is  "an act forbidden by law and which is at the same time revolting to the moral sentiments of the society” 

2. Law: The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines law as, 'a binding custom or practice of a communitya rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority' 

According to John Austin, “Law is the aggregate set of rules set by a man as politically superior, or sovereign to men, as political subjects.”

According to Oliver Wendell Holmes, “Law is a statement of  the circumstances in which public force will be brought to bear upon through courts.”


So if you would have closely gone through the above definitions and noticed the highlighted words, you would now in some corner of your mind be linking law and crime.


Now the question arises how is Crime related to Law and does Crime exists without Law?

To understand the relation between Law and Crime, let's take a simple example:

Suppose in a country, Mr. A kills Mr. B but there exists no specific definition for such killing in that country neither there is some punishment for such act

Will Mr. B be tried for committing a Crime?

How will the scenario change if such a thing happens in India? Murder or Culpable Homicide! Right.

Now coming to the answer, Crime is nothing but disobedience of Law. If the law forbids an act and a person commits that very act, he is said to have committed a crime


Crimes are the acts that are well defined by some statute (with definite punishments) that are a threat to Public Safety. Thus crimes are considered to be committed against the State rather than a Private Individual.

But are all violations of law are Crimes?

NO, Crime is an act punishable by law as forbidden by some statute or is injurious to public welfare.

For example: If a person is on death bed with no hopes of life and you euthanize that person in order to reduce his sufferings, will it be a crime?

In Belgium NO, but in Sri Lanka YES!


Hence, the very existence of crime depends upon the law itself. If the law doesn't recognize an act as a crime, it will not be a crime; though it could be a crime in some other state where it is defined. (Please refer to above example)

   This unique blend of Crime and Law gives birth to a new branch of law called Criminal Law.

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Criminal Law is, ' The law of Crimes and their Punishment'

Criminal Law thus can be summarized as " a body of rules and statutes that defines the acts prohibited by the legislature as they threaten the public safety and welfare and defines punishment to be imposed on the commission of such acts"


P.S.: Thanks for reading. Suggestions and feedback are welcomed!


Comments

  1. Great piece of writing. Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a way of explaining things...........awesome

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice explaination!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Waiting for more.............

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey! very well written, waiting for more now! I'm gonna share it with my friends.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Superb, simple, technical yet easy to understand! Wow

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really like your writing style, do write more..................eagerly waiting

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great Article bro!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very well written. Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Really nice! Great content. Looking forward to seeing more. All the best πŸ‘

    ReplyDelete
  12. It was very well explained...unlike some sites where u get a lot of content but little understanding,ur content was simplified but explained almost everything...good work πŸ‘Œ okk

    ReplyDelete
  13. It was very well explained...unlike some sites where u get a lot of content but little understanding,ur content was simplified but explained almost everything...good work πŸ‘Œ okk

    ReplyDelete
  14. Really good... explained a lot in a simplified manner..this is how u do itπŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

    ReplyDelete
  15. Your work is very good..it has limited content which is actually the crux of everything from the topic but the understanding we get from it is not at all limited...it is amazing how you are doing it

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Difference between Theft, Robbery and Dacoity

Theft v. Robbery v. Dacoity ( ΰ€šोΰ€°ी , ΰ€²ूΰ€Ÿ ΰ€”ΰ€° ΰ€‘ΰ€•ैΰ€€ी ) Theft, robbery and dacoity are terms that are generally used interchangeably and assumed as a synonym to one-another. But in law, they are not the same. They have different meaning and distinct essential characteristics. Let’s analyze each of them. 1.       1.  Theft ( ΰ€šोΰ€°ी) : Theft is defined under Section 378 of the Indian Penal Code.   (Image source: https://www.gps-securitygroup.com/how-to-prevent-theft-and-shoplifting-at-your-retail-store/) Theft is committed when somebody takes out some movable property (i.e. which can be moved e.g. car, money, animals etc.) out of the possession of the owner without his consent and with a dishonest intension to steal it. The victim may or may not be present at the site of theft. Illustration : Suppose a friend of yours comes to your house when you are not there. He sees a gold ring lying on a table. He hides it with the intension of telling you ...

Doctrines under Art. 13 of the Indian Constitution

  Doctrines under Art. 13 of the Indian Constitution Art. 13(1) of the Indian constitution constitutes two doctrines so as to protect the existence of Fundamental Rights. Fundamental rights are the most precious gifts that our constitution offers to its citizens. They are above every other law(though with reasonable restrictions). To protect the existence and subsistence of these fundamental rights, two doctrines are originated under Art 13(1) of the Constitution. Art. 13(1) of the Constitution reads as : ‘ All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void.’   Thus, art. 13 (1) talks about pre-constitutional laws. As per Art. 13 (1), all the laws before the enactment of the constitution (pre-constitution laws) that are not in consistence with the Fundamental Rights shall be adjudicated void. ...

Characteristics of Indian Legal System

 Characteristics of Indian Legal System The Constitution of India provides for a single integrated judicial system with Supreme Court at the apex, High Courts at the middle (state level) and the District Courts at the local level. It also provides for an independent and powerful judicial system. The following are the basic characteristics of the Indian Legal System: 1. Single and integrated Judicial System: The constitution establishes a single integrated judicial system for the whole of India.  The Supreme Court is the highest court of the country followed by High Courts and District Courts. The Supreme Court runs and controls the judicial administration of India. All courts of India form links of a single integrated judicial system. 2. Independence of Judiciary The Constitution makes Judiciary truly independent with provisions like: Appointment of Judges by the President. High qualifications for appointment of judges. Independent establishment for Judiciary. Adequate power...